《哈姆雷特》讀後感5篇

值得我們寫讀後感的書肯定是要推薦給讀者的，一篇優秀的讀後感肯定是會融入自己的情感的，下面是本站小編為您分享的《哈姆雷特》讀後感5篇，感謝您的參閲。

《哈姆雷特》讀後感篇1

假期裏，我懷着尋找英雄的心情去讀了戲劇大師莎士比亞的著作，同時是四大悲劇之一的《哈姆雷特》。正所謂“一千個人眼中有一千個哈姆雷特”，而在我眼中，他，不是個英雄。

讀完這本書之後，我深深地認為，哈姆雷特是個無勇無謀的懦夫，一個徹頭徹尾的失敗者。身為丹麥王子的他，從父親亡魂口中得知是叔叔卑鄙地殺死了父親——那個正直的丹麥王；又陰險地誘惑他的母親——那位外表十分貞淑的王后；再使用詭計，騙過了所有的丹麥國民，佔有了本不屬於他的一切。得知真相後，哈姆雷特實在要負起復仇的責任，但是他除了嚷嚷着一定要報仇外，卻沒有幹過一件對復仇有幫助的事。

他那“精明”的復仇計劃中，除了裝瘋賣傻就毫無有效的措施，而且他裝瘋賣傻的用意讓人難以理解。如果説他裝瘋賣傻是為了接近那個奸人，掩人耳目，倒也可以理解，甚至要為他的聰明才智拍手叫絕。然而，他這樣做除了證實這個奸人所做的壞事，讓他確信這是個謀殺兄長、篡奪王位的小人外，我實在看不出如何有助於復仇。他一點謀略也沒有。

如果這是他絞盡腦汁想出來的“高明”的計策的話，我便無話可説。但他儘可運用他那出眾的劍術，三下五除二了結了這個奸人，可是他卻沒有勇氣去做，還要給自己的怯弱戴上“謹慎”的桂冠。他沒有一點點氣魄。

雖然最後奸王是死在了他的劍下。但是，從當時的情形來看，他是趁着情況混亂，看到母親已經中毒身亡，而自己也身中劇毒，無藥可救，被形勢所逼，才舉起手中那遲遲疑疑、猶猶豫豫，幾次想舉起又從未舉起的復仇之劍。如果當時沒有外部因素的刺激，哈姆雷特就還不能下定決心去復仇。

我始終不覺得他是個英雄。

《哈姆雷特》讀後感篇2

the tragedy of hamlet, prince of denmark, or more simply hamlet, is a tragedy by william shakespeare, believed to have been written between 1599 and 1601. the play, set in denmark, recounts how prince hamlet exacts revenge on his uncle claudius, who has murdered hamlet's father, the king, and then taken the throne and married gertrude, hamlet's mother. the play vividly charts the course of real and feigned madness—from overwhelming grief to seething rage—and explores themes of treachery, revenge, in-ce-st, and moral corruption.

despite much literary detective work, the exact year of writing remains in dispute. three different early versions of the play have survived: these are known as the first quarto (q1), the second quarto (q2) and the first folio (f1). each has lines, and even scenes, that are missing from the others. shakespeare probably based hamlet on the legend of amleth, preserved by 13th-century chronicler saxo grammaticus in his gesta danorum and subsequently retold by 16th-century scholar franois de belleforest, and a supposedly lost elizabethan play known today as the ur-hamlet.

given the play's dramatic structure and depth of characterization, hamlet can be analyzed, interpreted and argued about from many perspectives. for example, scholars have debated for centuries about hamlet's hesitation in killing his uncle. some see it as a plot device to prolong the action, and others see it as the result of pressure exerted by the complex philosophical and ethical issues that surround cold-blooded murder, calculated revenge and thwarted desire. more recently, psychoanalytic critics have examined hamlet's unconscious desires, and feminist critics have re-evaluated and rehabilitated the often maligned characters of ophelia and gertrude.

hamlet is shakespeare's longest play and among the most powerful and influential tragedies in the english language. it provides a storyline capable of "seemingly endleretelling and adaptation by others". during shakespeare's lifetime, the play was one of his most popular works, and it still ranks high among his most-performed, topping, for example, the royal shakespeare company's list since 1879. it has inspired writers from goethe and dickens to joyce and murdoch and has been described as "the world's most filmed story after cinderella". the title role was almost certainly created for richard burbage, the leading tragedian of shakespeare's time. in the four hundred years since, it has been played by highly acclaimed actors, and sometimes actresses, of each successive age.

" hamlet " of shakespear is a classical representative work. this book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and like the dramatis personae horatio said: " you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result." windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch. hamlet wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from germany, is attends his father's funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father's funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the uncle claudius' wedding ceremony, this had caused hamm the wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was uncle hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with claudius. finally, sent out sword the revenge to claudius.

hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.

《哈姆雷特》讀後感篇3

如果説太陽是目標的.話，就要看着它一直追下去。讀了《哈姆雷特》，我是更加相信了。

現在，在死神的地窖裏，有多大的宴席，説不定席上各人又在提着酒杯追打，打得最兇的，一定是哈姆雷特了。我的確是為他感到婉惜的。父親不明不白地去世，母親這樣快的改嫁，在如此大的波動下，偏偏父親的鬼魂還要來説這樣的話。所以那提着劍到宮內裝瘋賣傻的，是多麼善良的哈姆雷特啊。可是，即使有那樣大的善良，在這樣大的壓力與因擾下，人的野性也會漸漸地顯露出來的，他的越來越大膽的舉止，不曾掩遮過的想法，一直指導自己去見母親，甚至殺死波洛涅斯，這可是一位沒有過錯的大臣，是一直忠於自己的主的。相矛盾的，在這樣嚇人的舉動中，他也對自己的行為猶豫不決。不過是一直向目標走的。所以悲劇，才會在這樣的矛盾下產生。

我只是驚歎哈姆雷特的執着，從他立下報仇的目標到實現它的整個過程裏，時時都會有猶豫，不過是對行為的，對目標是從未動搖過的，他也一直走到了目標。不過於猶豫相對應的，這勝利者沒有嚐到果子，他和自己的果子，還有自己的仇人，一起沉在了泥裏，應該也有原因是在重大的壓力下對原本善良的違背，也就是在違背本心的條件下吧。所以實在是該對他感到惋惜的。

但是悲劇是哈姆雷特上演的，我們既然是觀眾，是不能也作一場悲劇的主人公的。我們更要是守着自己的本心，毫不遲疑地看着目標向前走的，是不能和終點處的旗子一同爛掉的。

所以，一直向太陽走的話，應該是不會錯的。最美好的年紀，應該是要向着太陽走的。曾經的夢想繁多而輕浮，就像自己現在的成績，天天臆想着偷工減料，耍些聰明，最後發現，擁抱自己的並不是太陽，而是黑暗。不要在最需要心無旁騖的時期放棄了追趕太陽的權利，無論什麼時候，腳踏實地的向太陽才會所向披靡。

一直向着太陽，它將會成為你奔跑時，永不會潰敗的力量。

《哈姆雷特》讀後感篇4

shakspere (wrong spelling) created hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father, he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery. on the contrary, we can also say that hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge . if (capitalize "if" since it is the beginning word of the sentence.) a country has no king, how can a country keep alive (you need a question mark here since it is a question.) so, every thing has two sides, the bright side and adumbral side. every time we make a decision we have to think twice.

comment:

be careful with your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. too many uncessary mistakes.

it is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of hamlet. thats quite objective and convincing.

《哈姆雷特》讀後感篇5

?哈姆雷特》是莎士比亞的“四大杯具”之首。這是一部復仇的杯具。丹麥王子哈姆雷特的爸爸被叔父害死，叔父不但篡奪王位，還娶王后為妻。哈姆雷特見到了父王的鬼魂，得知事實真相後立誓復仇，最後與對手同歸於盡。

哈姆雷特無疑是書中非常重要的人物。在所有事情發生之前，他是個單純、對將來充滿完美期望的年輕人。但伴隨他爸爸死去，叔父繼位後，他的性格特點就發生了巨大的改變。他猶豫、失望，常常自言自語，感歎運勢的不公。特別是在哈姆雷特從鬼魂口中得知真相將來，他常常像癲狂一樣，發泄出心中的憤怒。他決心承擔起復仇的重任，但在行動時又遲疑不決。書中的一段獨白體現了他矛盾的心理：“存活還是毀滅，這是一個值得研究的問題；默然忍受運勢的暴虐的毒箭，或是挺身反抗人世的無涯的苦難，在奮鬥中掃清所有，這兩種行為，哪一種更高貴？”最後，憑着他對夢想的至死不渝，他完成了宿命。

莎士比亞對哈姆雷特的形象、性格的塑造可謂淋漓盡致。經過哈姆雷特的幾段內心獨白，表現出他反覆變化的心理和他對生活的種種考慮，使哈姆雷特的人物形象又增添了幾分杯具色彩。書中的鬼魂是個導火索，正是他的出現，讓哈姆雷特走向毀滅。鬼魂的幾次呼喊和感歎也是深入人心，呈現出一幅悲壯的畫面，又給這個杯具添上一筆悲情的色彩。

在最後哈姆雷特決鬥中，國王被哈姆雷特手中的毒箭殺死，他的那句“毒藥，發揮你的力量吧！”彷彿是他最後的發泄，又彷彿是他的昭告，表達出了他心中所有的仇恨。哈姆雷特對這個世界已經絕望，在他臨死之前，他對他最好的朋友霍拉旭的一番話表達了他的情感：“你假如愛我，請你暫時犧牲一下天堂上的幸福，留在一個冷漠的人間，替我傳述這故事吧。”可見他對這個冰冷的世界已毫無眷戀之情，對這個世界充滿憎恨。

哈姆雷特最後對邪惡勇敢地發出了最後一擊，雖然最後被惡毀滅了，可是他用自我的行動昭告了詩人，他的人文主義精神和夢想散發出燦爛的光輝被大家永遠銘記。